Here is an
example of some of China's internet regulations.
- Inciting to resist or breaking the Constitution or laws or the implementation of administrative regulations;
- Inciting to overthrow the government or the socialist system;
- Inciting division of the country, harming national unification;
- Inciting hatred or discrimination among nationalities or harming the unity of the nationalities;
- Making falsehoods or distorting the truth, spreading rumours, destroying the order of society;
- Promoting feudal superstitions, sexually suggestive material, gambling, violence, murder;
- Terrorism or inciting others to criminal activity; openly insulting other people or distorting the truth to slander people;
- Injuring the reputation of state organizations;
to construct. Independents can’t afford too much traditional campaigning, so social media has become more important. Social media can get a team that does analytics and find people in the electorate to target and use them as a vehicle to spread the word. Clay Shirky talks of the leader of the herd mentality. Some research says social media is more important than phoning, door knocks, handing out cards and outdoor advertising.Obama went to YouTube to be noticed and admired by young voters. In America, where voting is not mandatory, winning over non-voters is as important as persuading voters to change parties. The Kevin 07 campaign was also successful and he was seen as hip and with the times for doing it. Both pollies used YouTube and found success whereas in 07' John Howard failed. The Liberal party was just putting boring speeches up which was the right platform, but wrong content. It is important to balance entertainment with credibility. I do not want to see Abbott is budgie smugglers again. According to Jim Macnamara, professor of public communication at the University of Technology Sydney “The key to social media is being sociable – not distributing packaged slogans and polemic."
It is interesting as a spectator to see people do parodies of
pollies on YouTube. Even if politicians were not campaigning in social media, those parodies would still exist. When politicians enter social media, a world constructed by society and the fifth estate, pollies can be on a slippery slop in that environment. The below YouTube video shows Mitt Romney as an elite, sycophantic person far removed from normal society. MyBarackObama.com 2008, paved the way with how to do it. It made republicans look backward and out-dated. In US you need to get people to
vote, then vote for you, unlike Australia. Obama, with the help of Mary Joyce I might add, got the under 30’s and the ethnic vote to get him
over the line. Peer to peer techniques aimed at specific targets were used as he had Latino campaigners persuading Latino's, elderly to the elderly and so on. This is a huge benefit of social media for politicians, they can directly address certain demographics and segments.
According to Greg Jericho
(aka, Grog’s Gamut, his blogging pseudonym), “many Australian politicians have joined twitter, but only a
few have embraced the medium with any verve.” Julia Gillard is an example of a pollie who regularly
tweets, as you can observe from her twitter account. On a slow day, 5 tweets, but on a busy day, like budget day or when the
white sheet came out, up to 20. Mind you, most, if not all of those tweets,
would be on her behalf.
As Pauline Mathewson noted on her Dragonist blog when referring to pollie Tony
Burke's tweet skills, “it is not easy for a politician to hit the right not on
twitter. Some think it’s just another megaphone with which to blast criticisms
at their opponents. Others use it to mouth their own party’s meaningless pap
and propaganda. But Bourke has got the right balance. He uses it to make real
connections with real people.” In saying this, one must be careful not to over
tweet, give away too much personal information and not give the impression you
have nothing better to do. Also once something is tweeted it is there forever, making flip flopping more difficult. Social media is about finding the right balance and placing the right imagery and characteristics in the correct context. One would expect pollies to talk with the people on social media, not talk at them. It is my contention that society doesn't view politicians as real people,'one of us', so it feels odd to see them in a realm we have claimed as our own.
References
Abbott, Jason P. The Political
Economy of the Internet in Asia and the Pacific Digital Divides, Economic Competitiveness
and Security Challenges. New York: Praeger, 2004.
Jericho, G. 2012 'How many votes are there on Twitter?' in The rise
of the Fifth Estate: social media and blogging in Australian politics,
Scribe Publications Pty Ltd, Australia, EBL eBook Library.
McNamara, J, 2010, The Sydney Morning Herald, Pollies Still Missing the Point Of Social
Media, http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/pollies-still-missing-the-point-of-social-media-20100804-11dkt.html
Young, S. 2010, 'New, political reporting and the internet' in How
Australia decides: election reporting and the media, Cambridge University
Press, Australia, EBL eBook Library viewed 28 February 2012, pp 203-228.
Images
Image 1. https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ8I6G1UCPuwD4azAREFR5i4Q7EYYFQa4zktvWWMxEuxSXmC2nh2Q
Image 3.
Image 4. https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZ0Gj8ltBjXIj3vQFEbnZ4lgRQRt_4zIVMmJZIDSUs5kZ7Hjr4rg
Youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAyAeaUwBPY
Seeing as you mentioned China and censorship, I can't help but go the full six degrees you here. Last year a rich Chinese man was doing burnouts in front of the Great Wall in a Ferrari and after that incident the government had censored certain parts of Ferrari's website.
ReplyDelete